Over the past few weeks in class, we have been discussing
and reading about peer reviewing our peer's writing. In the readings, I learned
not to be so harsh when leaving comments but to act like it is your own paper
that you are editing. Give good feedback and help them to make their paper a
lot easier to understand as a reader. When our teacher first told us we were
going to have to peer edit papers, my first thought was how I am going to edit
someone else's paper when I can't even edit my own. The first thing I think of
when editing papers is correcting grammar and spelling mistakes so that should
be easy. Well I thought wrong, there was much more to reviewing a paper than
just spelling and grammar. According to the readings we have done and the
process through which we have already incorporated with our literacy
narratives, I have learned that after we read our peer’s papers we are supposed
to comment on what we thought they did well, what we would change, and what
confused us. This process has been absolutely wonderful in helping me to
realize what my strengths were and what my weaknesses were. However, I really don’t like reading so it
made the process of reviewing my other classmate’s papers a lot harder than I
had expected. It helped me to read the paper out loud so that I could hear
myself speaking and actually comprehend their mistakes. I found it odd that
reading these papers was actually pretty interesting and made me want to help
my classmates with their paper because they did such a good job of commenting
on mine and helping me through the process.
Your blog took the words right out of my mouth. I felt exactly the same way and I myself can't stand reading but oddly enough, I enjoyed my classmates papers.
ReplyDelete